Science Based.....I love it!
A very good friend of mine and I have talked considerably about young dog exercise. I'm not talking about running your pup on the concrete or asphalt. I'm talking about getting them out in the field, not on a leash, allowing them free time to run, chase, navigate, swim etc. For a very long time I've been a strong believer in natural, organic muscular and skeletal development in dogs less than a year old.
"You're allowing those pups too much play time Jed!" You'll ruin them! And yet I got three more EXCELLENT prelims this last year.
IE Mia's Mile 2.98 sub 3 minute mile by a 18 month old golden. Hip prelim = EXCELLENT
I'm so fortunate/blessed to have training grounds that allow me to not only train, hunt, test the goldens each day but to allow them free time in the field. I believe it contributes to their mental, cognitive, muscular and skeletal developments. In addition, the free time builds trust in our relationship. The only place on earth I'm the alpha male. What the heck am I talking about? I know dog owners who can't let their pooch off the lease. The dog will bolt are get into trouble. While I'm a strong believer in leash training, my dogs have learned to obey and cue off the whistles and signs I use everyday in the field.
The science - Source :www.vetlessons.com
Long-distance running doesn't cause cartilage degeneration: Domestic dogs, like wolves, are born to run. A team of Finnish researchers proved this point in shocking fashion. In two studies, Beagle puppies ran for 5 days/week on a 15-degree incline treadmill. In the first study, they ran for 1 hour/day for 15 weeks. In the second study, they ran up to 40km/day (24mi) for an entire year. How did their developing cartilage respond? Could it handle the strain or did it crumble? When researchers examined their cartilage under a microscope, it appeared normal. The joint lining and lubricating fluid were also normal. The only difference compared to control joints was superficial cartilage matrix change. This lack of degeneration should be no surprise. Human studies show a similar lack of arthritis risk when runners are compared to couch potatoes. The awful experience these puppies endured taught us valuable lessons. We should use this information to help today’s puppies. Sadly, society has chosen to ignore or misinterpret the data.
Common response: "This is a bad comparison. My dog's not a Beagle."
Science-based answer: Breed is important, but not because of differences in exercise. The genes which code for size and shape overlap the genes which code for joint disease. We can reduce genetic risk, but not by limiting exercise.
If running caused joint disease, dogs would be extinct: Extensive genetic analyses of domestic and wild dogs prove that all domestic dogs originate from gray wolves. Their cubs are famous for their vigorous play and awe-inspiring endurance. Wolf cubs can maintain a tireless gait for hours at 8-9kph. In Winter, adult wolves usually bring the whole family with them when they hunt. Some of the longest recorded wolf migrations involve immature wolves. For example, one radio-collared pack including an 8 week old pup travelled up to 32km per day. There’s a single case report of non-clinical hip dysplasia in a Timberwolf. If exercise was the trigger, wolves wouldn't have survived for 750,000 years.
Common response: "This is a bad comparison. My dog's not a wolf."
Science-based answer: Wolves teach us that endurance exercise doesn't harm developing joints. Guide dogs teach us that restricted exercise doesn't help developing joints. According to popular opinion, guide dog puppies get "ideal" exercise. In theory, a puppyhood of low-impact leash walks should protect their "vulnerable" joints. Unfortunately, the theory isn't supported by reality. The commonest reason for guide dog health withdrawal is musculoskeletal disorders. In 2016, it accounted for 28% of retirements. Historical guide dog hip dysplasia and elbow dysplasia prevalence is 20-30%. Cruciate ligament injuries are also common. Guide dog charities have reduced joint disease risk over several decades. Their success owes everything to careful breeding and nothing to limited exercise.
Restricted puppies have a higher risk of hip dysplasia: The hip is a ball-and-socket joint. It's surrounded by muscles which form part of the core. Puppies with hip dysplasia develop loose hips during their growth spurt. If the hip capsule is loose, an affected puppy depends on their core to stabilize their hips. Advocates of puppyhood restriction cite the "5-minute rule". This means restricting twice daily exercise to 5-minutes per month of age. Such extreme restriction is the last thing a high-risk puppy needs. It weakens core strength, promotes weight gain and impairs socialization.
Common response: "The 5-minute rule is a guideline. It prevents irresponsible exercise."
Science-based answer: We call this response a slippery slope fallacy. How would it sound if we applied the same argument to diet? For example, imagine a friend suggested a diet of one carrot per month of age. There's no question this is an unbalanced and unhealthy diet. If you told them so, here's what their slippery slope argument would sound like: "This is a guideline. It's a good way to stop you feeding nothing but hamburgers and chocolate." It might be reasonable to accept the guideline fallacy if exercise restriction was safe, but it isn't. There's published evidence that restricted puppies have a higher risk of hip dysplasia. My professional advice is to focus on keeping puppies lean and fit. They can choose their own exercise without being forced to do too much or too little.
A very good friend of mine and I have talked considerably about young dog exercise. I'm not talking about running your pup on the concrete or asphalt. I'm talking about getting them out in the field, not on a leash, allowing them free time to run, chase, navigate, swim etc. For a very long time I've been a strong believer in natural, organic muscular and skeletal development in dogs less than a year old.
"You're allowing those pups too much play time Jed!" You'll ruin them! And yet I got three more EXCELLENT prelims this last year.
IE Mia's Mile 2.98 sub 3 minute mile by a 18 month old golden. Hip prelim = EXCELLENT
I'm so fortunate/blessed to have training grounds that allow me to not only train, hunt, test the goldens each day but to allow them free time in the field. I believe it contributes to their mental, cognitive, muscular and skeletal developments. In addition, the free time builds trust in our relationship. The only place on earth I'm the alpha male. What the heck am I talking about? I know dog owners who can't let their pooch off the lease. The dog will bolt are get into trouble. While I'm a strong believer in leash training, my dogs have learned to obey and cue off the whistles and signs I use everyday in the field.
The science - Source :www.vetlessons.com
Long-distance running doesn't cause cartilage degeneration: Domestic dogs, like wolves, are born to run. A team of Finnish researchers proved this point in shocking fashion. In two studies, Beagle puppies ran for 5 days/week on a 15-degree incline treadmill. In the first study, they ran for 1 hour/day for 15 weeks. In the second study, they ran up to 40km/day (24mi) for an entire year. How did their developing cartilage respond? Could it handle the strain or did it crumble? When researchers examined their cartilage under a microscope, it appeared normal. The joint lining and lubricating fluid were also normal. The only difference compared to control joints was superficial cartilage matrix change. This lack of degeneration should be no surprise. Human studies show a similar lack of arthritis risk when runners are compared to couch potatoes. The awful experience these puppies endured taught us valuable lessons. We should use this information to help today’s puppies. Sadly, society has chosen to ignore or misinterpret the data.
Common response: "This is a bad comparison. My dog's not a Beagle."
Science-based answer: Breed is important, but not because of differences in exercise. The genes which code for size and shape overlap the genes which code for joint disease. We can reduce genetic risk, but not by limiting exercise.
If running caused joint disease, dogs would be extinct: Extensive genetic analyses of domestic and wild dogs prove that all domestic dogs originate from gray wolves. Their cubs are famous for their vigorous play and awe-inspiring endurance. Wolf cubs can maintain a tireless gait for hours at 8-9kph. In Winter, adult wolves usually bring the whole family with them when they hunt. Some of the longest recorded wolf migrations involve immature wolves. For example, one radio-collared pack including an 8 week old pup travelled up to 32km per day. There’s a single case report of non-clinical hip dysplasia in a Timberwolf. If exercise was the trigger, wolves wouldn't have survived for 750,000 years.
Common response: "This is a bad comparison. My dog's not a wolf."
Science-based answer: Wolves teach us that endurance exercise doesn't harm developing joints. Guide dogs teach us that restricted exercise doesn't help developing joints. According to popular opinion, guide dog puppies get "ideal" exercise. In theory, a puppyhood of low-impact leash walks should protect their "vulnerable" joints. Unfortunately, the theory isn't supported by reality. The commonest reason for guide dog health withdrawal is musculoskeletal disorders. In 2016, it accounted for 28% of retirements. Historical guide dog hip dysplasia and elbow dysplasia prevalence is 20-30%. Cruciate ligament injuries are also common. Guide dog charities have reduced joint disease risk over several decades. Their success owes everything to careful breeding and nothing to limited exercise.
Restricted puppies have a higher risk of hip dysplasia: The hip is a ball-and-socket joint. It's surrounded by muscles which form part of the core. Puppies with hip dysplasia develop loose hips during their growth spurt. If the hip capsule is loose, an affected puppy depends on their core to stabilize their hips. Advocates of puppyhood restriction cite the "5-minute rule". This means restricting twice daily exercise to 5-minutes per month of age. Such extreme restriction is the last thing a high-risk puppy needs. It weakens core strength, promotes weight gain and impairs socialization.
Common response: "The 5-minute rule is a guideline. It prevents irresponsible exercise."
Science-based answer: We call this response a slippery slope fallacy. How would it sound if we applied the same argument to diet? For example, imagine a friend suggested a diet of one carrot per month of age. There's no question this is an unbalanced and unhealthy diet. If you told them so, here's what their slippery slope argument would sound like: "This is a guideline. It's a good way to stop you feeding nothing but hamburgers and chocolate." It might be reasonable to accept the guideline fallacy if exercise restriction was safe, but it isn't. There's published evidence that restricted puppies have a higher risk of hip dysplasia. My professional advice is to focus on keeping puppies lean and fit. They can choose their own exercise without being forced to do too much or too little.